Gender Wage Gap: Socialist Gynonomics
(scroll to bottom to read US Department of Labor study)
(also see Sexual Harassment @Work)
Little Susie: Verizon’s Entrepreneur
Dan Abrams: Women Are Better Than Men at Everything
Kay Hymowitz: Rise of Women Has Turned Men Into Boys
Hanna Rosin: Women Are Taking Control of Everything
In the US, 60% of college graduates are women; 53% of law, med, and MBA graduates are women; 75% of psychology PhDs are women, and 80% of veterinary graduates are women. Women are CEOs, generals, surgeons, astronauts, actors, senators, university presidents, and high-ranking government officials.
Girls Are Superior to Boys: At Drinking
Women Surpass Men in Advanced Degrees
Does It Matter if Girls Outperform Boys in School?
Women own 75% of America’s wealth, make 85% of consumer purchases, file 70%+ of divorces, have custody of children in 90% of cases, and receive 95% of all alimony and child support.
We often hear that women earn 77% of what men earn, based on institutional discrimination. This is a lie and a mathematical sham, but people willingly and gullibly believe it. Why? Because female victimhood is effective. Male guilt abounds.
The fact is, outside the traditional office, men and women don’t do the same jobs. How many men are occupied as daycare workers or dental hygienists? How many female welders have you seen perched dangerously atop giant bridges? Mathematics, not emotion, folks.
Do all men at the same level earn the same salary? Of course not.
People earn according to what they can negotiate. If men aren’t paid equally, how can men and women be paid equally? Socialists want everybody to get a trophy, just for showing up.
Women are accustomed to getting free drinks and meals — just for showing up. They aren’t trained to negotiate. Most women will admit they’re terrible negotiators. Lack of brains? Nope. Lack of skill and practice. Consequently, they expect employers to hand them big salaries — without negotiation. Gynonomics. Entitlement. Nonsense. Life doesn’t work that way.
(scroll all the way down to read US Department of Labor study)
When women cry foul, rightly or wrongly, men simply cave. Because 85% of legislators are male, women get almost any “right” they want. Accordingly, President Obama declared in July 2010 his support for the socialistic Paycheck Fairness Act; the left-wing (AAUW) American Association of University Women continues to bang the drum for it.
Juxtapose this nonsense with reality. In July 2010, Forbes posted its annual “Celebrity 100″ tabulation of top earners in show business. Guess what? Women hold six of the top-10 earning spots! Shouldn’t Obama force these women to give some money to the men who don’t hold the top spots — to equalize pay, to spread that wealth around?
Woman Power: The Rise of the SHEconomy
Men on the Mommy Track
Women Earn Less Than Men Only When They Work Less Than Men
Is a Woman’s Desire to Work Tied to Her Looks?
IBM Names New CEO: Virginia Rometty
Fortune Magazine: The 50 Most-Powerful Women (2011)
Lipstick Equals Competence
Slow Disappearance of the American Working Man
Forbes Magazine 2011: World’s 100 Most-Powerful Women
Discrimination Suit Against Bloomberg Failed
Who Really Runs Facebook: Sheryl Sandberg
Christine Lagarde Is IMF’s New Managing Director
US Supreme Court Decides for Walmart in Sex-Bias Case
The Cougar Economy
Women Dominate Television
Will Women Outnumber Men Among the Ultra-Rich?
The World’s Richest Moms
Top-50 Fastest-Growing Women-Led Companies: 2011
VH1 Reconfigures to Target Young Women
Tech’s Top Women Under 30: 2011
WSJ: There Is No Male-Female Wage Gap
The Hidden Job Crisis for American Men
Despite Recent “He-Covery,” It’s Still a Mancession
Dutch Women Want Men to Fund Their Lazy Lives
Obama Fabricates “Facts” About Female Wages
Science: Women Greater Than or Equal to Men
Bank of America: “Go Long” on Women
World Economic Forum: Female Quotas at Davos
London School of Economics: Women Want Rich Husbands, Not Careers
Women Should Be Allowed in Combat Units
MANcession Threatens American Dream
White House Czar Demands Female Affirmative Action on Wall Street
Fortune: 50 Most-Powerful Women in Business — 2010
WSJ: Most Female CEOs Are Also Mothers
“Equality — or Freedom?” by Pat Buchanan
Reverse Gender Gap: Individual Choices & Skills Determine Earnings
WSJ: Young Women Now Outearn Their Male Peers
(scroll all the way down to read US Department of Labor study)
Some women bemoan “the dearth of female executives,” as in this WSJ piece. If women earn the majority of college degrees, and now outearn their male counterparts, but don’t comprise the majority of executives, they choose not to be executives. Stop whining already!
Marc Debates Women’s Issues on Forbes on Fox — 09.01.07
Marc Debates Women’s Issues on Fox Business Bulls & Bears — 08.07.09
Regardless, women whine when another state enforces — or pretends to enforce — equality by banning ladies’ nights, denying them a coveted entitlement: CA, CO, CT, FL, HI, IA, MD, MN, MO, NE, NJ, PA, TX, and WI. Pathetically, most men favor ladies’ nights because they can’t get laid without plying women with booze.
In September 2010, a federal judge ruled that women are indeed entitled to free drinks, reinforcing my claim that dating and marriage, in most cases, are forms of legal prostitution.
Below is a clip of my 07.27.10 debate on Fox & Friends about Minnesota’s so-called ban.
US Department of Labor Wage-Gap Study
(scroll down to read)
The US Department of Labor hired CONSAD Research Corporation in Pittsburgh to study this so-called wage-gap matter. Surprise! No gender-based wage gap!
“An Analysis of the Reasons for the Disparity in Wages
Between Men and Women”
January 12, 2009
PREPARED FOR:
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment Standards Administration
200 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20210
PREPARED BY:
CONSAD Research Corporation
211 North Whitfield Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15206
Under Contract Number GS-23F-02598
Task Order 2, Subtask 2B
CONCLUSION
This study draws the unambiguous conclusion that the differences in the compensation of men and women are the result of a multitude of factors and that the raw wage gap should not be used as the basis to justify corrective action. Indeed, there may be nothing to correct. The differences in raw wages may be almost entirely the result of the individual choices being made by both male and female workers.
