Women to Rule Men by 2010
Just when you thought that legislative, judicial, law-enforcement, media, and reproductive biases in favor of women were the epitome of double standards, there is new evidence that “life control” is increasingly shifting to the female domain: in four years, women also will rule men financially. Remember this the next time the waiter brings the check to your table, and your woman insists that YOU pay it — or worse, you acquiesce.
By 2010, women will own all the power points of society. According to a new study by Allianz, a mammoth-sized financial-services firm, women in that year will control 60% of US wealth (Allianz news release displayed below). Here are the other critical Allianz findings:
- Today there are one-third more women graduating from college than men.
- Women’s median income has increased 60%+ over the past thirty years, while men’s median income has hardly increased at all.
- The number of women earning $100,000+ has quadrupled in last decade.
- Sixty percent of women with business degrees outearn their husbands.
- Women account for half of all stock-market investors.
What’s laughable is that, despite the professional and financial gains women have made and continue to make, Allianz indicates that they’re still unhappy! If you’re surprised, read my article, “If Women Were Happy,” to understand why.
Where’s this wealth coming from? Here are five common sources of female wealth:
- Wages, business earnings, and investments
- Family inheritance
- Becoming widowed at a young age
- Lucrative divorce settlements, alimony, and child support
- Being wined, dined, vacationed, and bejeweled during the dating process.
This Allianz announcement should be a big wakeup call to men. As I have been exhorting for some time, you must rethink the way you relate to women: View them as peers and refuse to tolerate their attitudes of entitlement and demands for special privileges and deferential treatment.
Little by little, women have been eating your lunch, literally and figuratively. And, it’s YOUR fault. Why? Because you have equated your money with your masculinity. You have believed that women are the weaker sex, that your mission in life is to take care of them. Well, the numbers tell a different story. Now that the power clock is running out, it’s time to equate chivalry with impotence — not power. Any man who continues to play ostrich by ignoring this admonition does so at his own peril.
Women are graduating from college in higher numbers than you. At a rising rate, they will outearn you. They make most of the household-spending decisions. They match you in stock ownership. And, four years from now, they will control most of the money in this country (to learn more about women in the US workplace, read from the US Department of Labor: Women’s Bureau). How much longer will you wait to act?
To err through commission is one thing, but failing to act is the biggest sin of all. Look at the situation in Iran. How many times over the past few years has sabre-rattling Iran promised to negotiate about curtailing its nuclear capability and then announce that it won’t negotiate? Too many to count. All the while, naive, head-in-the-sand Uncle Sam hoped for the best. Hope is not a strategy. Proof: Today, Iran test-fired a new submarine-to-surface missile during war games in the Persian Gulf. It won’t be long before such missiles are nuclear, when it will be too late for Uncle Sam to act. Then, the power of the world will unalterably shift. See any parallels?
How will our society look in 2010? I envision acrimony between men and women to skyrocket, resulting in an even-larger number of men refusing to get married and the out-of-wedlock birthrate to continue climbing unabated (already 35% for whites and 70% for blacks). The solution is so simple — men and women treat each other as peers — yet so few are interested in solving anything. They’d rather destroy each other in family courts. During all the battling, unfortunately, men are losing their power and influence.
Since 1930, Pluto was the ninth planet. Last week, it was demoted to dwarf status. Do you still think that wining & dining women makes you Master of the Universe? Think again, pal.
[EXTRA: Forbes List of World's 100 Most Powerful Women: 2006]
About the Author
Marc H. Rudov is an investment banker and business consultant residing in Silicon Valley, CA. He is the author of the book, The Man’s No-Nonsense Guide to Women: How to Succeed in Romance on Planet EarthTM (ISBN 0974501719), and 24 articles.
Rudov’s book, articles, blog, and podcasts are available at TheNoNonsenseMan.com.
Copyright © 2006 by Marc H. Rudov. All rights reserved.
================================================================
Despite Unprecedented Wealth and Power,
Most Women Feel Financially Insecure, Allianz Study Finds
Lack of financial knowledge leads to fears of losing all their money
NEW YORK, NY. – (August 22, 2006) – After decades of escalating education, income and participation in the workplace, women are expected to control 60% of the wealth in the United States by 2010 — an unprecedented milestone in the empowerment of women. Yet despite this economic gain, women feel financially insecure and unprepared to handle their growing wealth, with nearly half worrying about becoming a bag lady, according to the new Allianz Women, Money, and Power Study.
The study results also serve as a wake-up call for the financial services industry, which has a long way to go to meet the needs of female financial decision makers. The study found:
- Regardless of the fact that women are more educated, more involved in financial decisions and are controlling more of the wealth than ever before the vast majority (90%) feel somewhat or not at all financially secure.
- Despite this level of insecurity, women say financial security and freedom are 15 to 20 times more important to them than money-related status or respect.
- Along with this financial insecurity is this tremendous fear of losing all their money and becoming a bag lady — about half of women had the “bag lady” fear, and surprisingly, almost half of the wealthier women (those who earned more than $100,000 annually) also felt this way.
- Lack of knowledge is the biggest barrier to women getting more involved in managing household finances — four times as much a barrier as lack of time.
“The financial services industry has largely handled the financial needs of women the same way they handle men’s needs,” said Mark Zesbaugh, CEO of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America. “Given women’s evolving role in the economy and society, and now the insight we’ve gleaned from this research, the time is right for the financial services industry to adapt their approach to women.”
“In the last century, women revolutionized their roles in politics, family, and the workforce. This century, we are witnessing women breaking through the final barrier to gender equality — financial empowerment,” said Dr. Ken Dychtwald, America’s leading gerontologist, author of twelve books on aging-related issues including Age Wave, Age Power, The Power Years, and Workforce Crisis, and president of Age Wave. “This study enables us to develop a clear vision of women’s evolving financial roles and their distinct aspirations, challenges, and needs.”
“This study will guide financial advisers as they help female clients find effective financial strategies,” said Lisa Resnick, president of life and long term care insurance for Allianz. “Despite the insecurities women feel about their financial futures, women who already work with a financial advisor told us they feel more financially secure, confident and optimistic.”
Women’s roles in society, the economy, and at home have evolved to where an increasing amount of decision-making and control falls to women. Unlike women in previous generations, today’s woman finds herself in an unprecedented societal and economic shift:
- The percentage of women in the workforce almost doubled in the second half of the last century, from 32% to 62%.
- Today there are one-third more women graduating from college than men.
- Women’s median income has increased 60%+ over the past thirty years, while men’s median income has hardly increased at all.
- The number of women earning $100,000+ has quadrupled in last decade.
- Sixty percent of women with business degrees outearn their husbands.
- Women account for half of all stock-market investors.
- It is expected that by 2010, women will control 60% of wealth in the United States.
Allianz engaged Age Wave to design The Allianz Women, Money, and Power Study to provide insight into women’s relationships with money and investing, particularly at a time when women are at an all-time high in terms of their college graduation rates, numbers in the work force and earning power. The survey was conducted by Harris Interactive1 and asked 3,183 people — 1,925 women and 1,258 men — to identify their attitudes and behaviors towards money.
The Allianz Women, Money, and Power Study identified four key themes that illustrate women’s relationships with money and investing, and the gaps the financial services industry needs to fill in helping women meet their goals.
1) Financial Insecurity, Avoid Becoming a Bag Lady. The study found that financial insecurity defines women and their relationship with money:
- Regardless of the fact that women are more educated, more involved in financial decisions and are controlling more of the wealth than ever before the vast majority (90%) feeling somewhat or not at all financially secure.
- Nearly two-thirds of women said the best thing about having money is feeling secure and not the things money can buy.
- This insecurity may explain why women are twice as likely as men to have a secret stash in case of a financial emergency.
- Women who work with a financial advisor feel more responsible, confident and optimistic and more likely to have financial clarity, security, and satisfaction.
2) Personality Matters. The Allianz Women, Money, and Power Study identified five distinct personas from commonly recognized fictional characters that reflect women’s attitudes towards money and investing. The smallest percentage said they wanted a man to take care of them, while the largest percentage — over a third — consider themselves to be savvy and self-reliant investors.
- Cinderellas — 8% of women hope that Prince Charming will make everything okay and feel they lack sufficient knowledge to make smart financial decisions.
- Alices in Wonderlands — 17% of women are confused by all the financial choices and avoid financial responsibility.
- Wonder Women — 18% of women feel capable of handling whatever comes their way, feel confident, empowered, extremely knowledgeable about money and investing, and most likely to work with a financial advisor.
- Belles — 23% like to handle things equally with their partners, are communicative and happy with their marriages where household finances are concerned.
- Goldilockes — 35% of women thoroughly research their options before making financial decisions, they are confident, analytical and highly knowledgeable about household finances.
3) He Said / She Said. When it comes to finances, women and men have dramatically different approaches and perceptions of the other sex:
- Women view themselves as carrying more responsibilities and are therefore burdened with more worries; men see themselves as more analytical and more open to taking risks.
- The lack of savings and too much debt are the major sources of financial conflicts between men and women.
- Women are more likely to attribute arguments about money to issues of power and control, while men are more likely to attribute it to trust.
- While almost all husbands and wives say the ideal way for a married couple to meet with a financial advisor is for both of them to meet together, nearly half say they act alone.
- According to wives, husbands overestimate their leadership role when it comes to savings and investments — by a factor of three to one.
- Overwhelmingly, men find financially independent women sexy, while only 4% of men disagreed.
4) What Women Want — Financially. The study provides advice for financial planners to help them better understand women’s financial goals:
- For women, lack of knowledge is women’s biggest barrier to getting more involved with managing savings and investments — four times as much a barrier as lack of time.
- Women have a unique financial profile: they want less worry, less aggressive investing, more security and predictability, more simplicity and easier access to understandable financial information.
- Women are more than twice as likely as men to choose to work with a female financial advisor; however, 80% of financial advisors are men.
- Mature women — who seem to be much more empowered and in control of their lives than younger generations — have some sage advice to offer Boomer and Gen X/Y women: plan early, learn about finances/investing and strive for financial independence. The adage of “marrying well” no longer works — marry someone who is financially stable – was at the bottom of the list by a factor of 10 to 1.
The Allianz Women, Money, and Power Study demonstrates that the financial services industry can better position itself to work with women through key changes such as:
- Understanding that women are taking more control of their and their families’ finances.
- Acknowledging that we as a society are not educating our children about money.
- Playing a more active role in making sure financial education is more widely available in schools.
- Having more of a presence in women’s publications to promote financial literacy to women — in both the editorial and advertising pages.
- Recruiting more female financial advisors.
- Recognizing that women from older generations are ready to give advice to Generations X and Y.
- Realizing that it’s not just about women vs. men, but about the differences in women and segmenting according to age, personality traits, attitudes, and behaviors.
- Focusing on empowerment, rather than power.
1Trendsight Group
2 Bureau of Labor Statistics
3 Department of Education
4 Marketing to Women, by Marti Barletta
5 U.S. Census, Annual Demographic Survey
6 Marketing to Women, by Marti Barletta
7 Private Banker International, 2003
8 Trendsight Group
Study Methodology
Harris Interactive1 fielded a nationwide online survey for Allianz and Age Wave among 3,183 U.S. adults — 1,258 were men and 1,925 were women. The margin of error for the total sample was approximately +/- 2%. (See the full methodology document in the press kit.)
The online survey was conducted in the United States between May 4, 2006 and July 5, 2006. Figures for age by sex, education, race/ethnicity, region, income and net worth were weighted where necessary to align them with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online.
About Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America
Founded in 1896 and based in Minneapolis, Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America provides fixed and variable annuities, life insurance policies, and long term care insurance products in the United States. Known for innovation, performance and customer service, the company has become a leader in the North American life insurance industry. Allianz products are offered through a network of over 220,000 independent financial professionals. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America is one of the primary companies of Allianz AG, the 16th largest corporation in the world based on revenue (Fortune, August 2006). Allianz AG employs over 177,000 people worldwide.
About Age Wave
Age Wave was created in 1986 to guide leading companies and government groups worldwide in product and service development — geared to aging boomer and mature population segments. The company’s far-reaching explorations and innovative solutions have fertilized and catalyzed a broad spectrum of industry sectors from vitamins and cookies to automotive design and retail merchandising to mutual funds and health insurance. Age Wave’s services include groundbreaking primary and secondary research, cutting-edge brainstorming, business development guidance and a wide range of highly acclaimed presentations, communications and education programs. (http://www.agewave.com/)
About Harris Interactive2
Harris Interactive is the 12th largest and fastest-growing market research firm in the world. The company provides research-driven insights and strategic advice to help its clients make more confident decisions which lead to measurable and enduring improvements in performance. Harris Interactive is widely known for The Harris Poll, one of the longest running, independent opinion polls and for pioneering online market research methods. More information about Harris Interactive may be obtained at http://www.harrisinteractive.com/.
Men must organize politically and demand equality in marriage and family. When you get down to it, it does not matter who earns more or who stays home (albeit, we know who will do what in most marriages). What matters is that women have had complete control of family, as evidenced by “who files for divorce” and subsequent outcomes; and as evidenced by the fact that when a child is born out of wedlock, the father has absolutely no rights whatsoever.
The idea that a child is chattal property of the woman is sheer dictatorial nonsense that must be ended completely. Children belong to both parent’s, share their parent’s DNA equally, and are therefore the “property” of both parents. Government has no right to diminish this right, or overlook it in any way, unless a parent is provably unfit.
When this is changed, the other rights of men will naturally equalize over time. And, if we do not demand this change, with overwhelming consensus and political advocacy, our rights will continue to be diminished unabated.
I think a BIG discussion has to occur on a national level-AMONG MEN.
“In the last century, women revolutionized their roles in politics, family, and the workforce. This century, we are witnessing women breaking through the final barrier to gender equality — financial empowerment,†said Dr. Ken Dychtwald, Americaâ€s leading gerontologist, author of twelve books on aging-related issues including Age Wave, Age Power, The Power Years, and Workforce Crisis, and president of Age Wave.
The “final barrier to gender equality”?? says Ken Dychtwald.
How about: the final barrier to gender (female) dominance?
Why is it, that empowering women over men
(as has been done in virtually every other area of life including the family) is seen as
“equality” for women? Both men and women have worked for 40+ years to rig all the rules of hiring, promoting, family law, and on and on, to advantage women at the expense of men. If the playing field was fair the world would look different today. The strategy has always been the same. Give all the power and advantages to the women while at the same time the women continue to complain thereby assuring that any particular “problem” never has enough solutions (e.g., freebies, advantages, rights etc.). And the solutions keep on coming.
When the hell will men wake up? After it is too late?
Time will tell. And it won’t be a long wait.
(From the article): “Whereâ€s this wealth coming from? Here are five common sources of female wealth:
* Wages, business earnings, and investments
* Family inheritance
* Becoming widowed at a young age
* Lucrative divorce settlements, alimony, and child support
* Being wined, dined, vacationed, and bejeweled during the dating process”
Interesting that four of these five generators of female wealth all derive from menâ€s wealth being appropriated.
There is a scientific word defining organisms that feed off of and benefit by doing no work while appropriating the lifeblood of other organisms —
PARASITES.
That is the word.
The only word that fully describes the female species in its contemporary guise.
Gents, it is in fact a ZERO-SUM GAME.
YOU are the HOST of the GAME!
Get used to it, because you’re losing.
To all the guys out there I am asking for some direction or input.
What could men do to bring these issues to the common public. Feminists control the media and politics. And the few things that do slip through are derided by calling them sexists, bigoted, ect.
So what way should men bring out thier issues to overcome this.
Are there any real good discussion forums on men’s issues? If so could you point me to them?
Get ALL of your male friends and colleagues to send e-mails and faxes to their state and federal legislators, to their governors, and to President Bush. Tell them that you are SICK of the anti-male laws and pro-female privileges.
At this point, a public forum for men that does not result in a MASSIVE letter-writing campaign is a waste. Remember, 100% of the US Senate voted to reauthorize VAWA 2006 — an unconstitutional law — which is a slam against men.
Why is VAWA a runaway train? Women have been raised to be professional whiners & complainers, and they have defeated men with their voices. Men have sat on the sidelines, watching themselves lose.
Elected officials want only one thing in life: to get reelected. They listen to whiners & complainers. They love votes, not voters.
So Marc,
Are you propsing that men should “out-whine” the feminazis as a way to get clout in Congress?
For starters, men don’t like to whine.
It makes them feel like girls.
What other strategic advice do you have to offer?
I think you should reread what I wrote above. The answer is there.
So Marc you are proposing that a MASSIVE letter writing campaign will do the trick? (Of course e-mails, faxes, pigeons landing on the White House?)
Are you serious?
A massive letter-writing, e-mail, and fax campaign stopped the ridiculous immigration bill in its tracks. It DOES work.
First step is to stop allowing any woman – who knows exactly jack and shit about being a man – to define your masculinity for you.
Last time I had some woman start with “A real man would…” I stopped her dead in her tracks and said, “Excuse me – do you scratch your nuts in the morning? Pee standing up? Get prostate exams? No? That who the fuck are you to tell me what men do?”
If even half the men in this country would say that tomorrow to some flannel-mouth femherroid tomorrow, we’d cut the BS by 75% in one fell swoop.
The other part is to stop caring if women cry. Let them. In fact, I approach every conversation with a feminist with the goal of upsetting them in one way or another.
You won’t persuade the dumbkopfs anyway, you might as well have some fun.
The other half is to confront men like Ken Dychtwald. I don’t know if this guy is a metrosexual, a true feminist believer, or a guy who has been so politically corrected that he has stopped thinking and simply reacts like Pavlov’s Dog. But it is important to get “in their shit” too. Men have got to fucking wake up. The first discussion and perhaps battle has to occur among men. Then it’s time to really go after the feminists. Feminists derive the power they have largely because we men are unorganized (and with men like Dychtwald-divided) . Because of this they have immense influence on the power points in society. Take that big advantage away and we will finish off the feminists rather quickly. We can start rolling things back to real equality and fairness. THAT will be a fun day.
I like the massive letter writing campaign.
A good model for the “massive letter writing campaign” would be the numbersusa.com anti illegal immigration web site. They have send hundreds of thousands of faxes to elected officials.
All,
With all due respect to Marc, I believe that emails and faxes won’t do it. Men have taken this laying down for 40 years, and faxing and emailing their eyeballs out.
According to my insider sources, Republicans don’t think there is a demographic to even be measured in terms of the “men’s rights”, or the “legitimate marriage movement”. This is why they continue to ignore us.
I believe that an organized solidarity campaign, demanding respect for men, equal rights to be in the family, equal access and rights to be parents, and reform of family law.
I propose we make this an annual event, perhaps for the Friday before fathers day, to include a “blue day” where nobody works and everyone goes to their city hall or county adminstrative building to protest. Protests in DC will not work because most divorced men can’t afford the trip. This has to be a international, distributed effort.
These people won’t change until they see lots of bodies raising heck in the streets. This, I guarantee, as proven by my 19 years in this movement.
Do we have a “sane” group willing to organize this and keep the heat on year-after-year?
In my opinion, conservatives worship women and liberals hate men. Bottom line: men get hosed. I still believe that a massive campaign — coordinated with media (especially talk radio) involvement — will work. Men always give up or never try: the results speak for themselves.
Also, men can and must do what I suggest in my article: STOP KISSING WOMEN’S ASSES AND STOP GETTING MARRIED. What will Congress do when almost every child born is illegitimate? It will be a HUGE social-policy nightmare.
Keep putting pressure on elected officials. Keep denying women free meals and marriage. I’m telling you this will affect society.
Or, you can do nothing, as usual, and watch your ship slowly sink.
I think that political trends going back a decade and a half indicate that political parties (and their various interest groups/supporters) are becoming more homogenous and also moving away from the political “center.” Feminists (as a potent force) cannot be found in the Republican party, and have mostly taken their cause to the Democrats. Cultural conservatives have likewise moved away from the Democratic party and now are ever-present in the GOP. In other words, to be effective over the long term a movement needs to latch on to an existing political party or broader social movement. That’s the tactic feminists employed in the 1970s by latching on to the civil rights movement, and they were very successful.
In addition to massive letter writing campaigns (which are only effective in short spurts, such as affecting specific legislation) I think the way to go in the long term is to start debating within the conservative movement. Our chief opponents will be a few social conservatives who effectively ally themselves with feminists (their supposed arch enemies) in support of divorce law and family law. Conservatives want to increase the stakes for couples facing divorce, as a method of preserving the family. They want to make divorce as much a nightmare as possible so that couples will reconsider their divorces, and so they tacitly accept feminist policies.
The challenge to us is to remind such conservatives that it is women who initiate the lion’s share of divorces (2/3), and thus men who behave like honorable husbands and responsible fathers have no recourse. To play to the mentality of such conservatives, we need to convince them that existing law needs to be amended to more specifically target such women who are initiating these divorces. It is these women who need to be given pause before they break up the family, and public policy needs to reflect that change. This is the way to appeal to the feminists’ unwitting allies on the right — to enshrine the reforms we seek under the banner of “preserving the family.” If we concentrate our political energy on the right, we can dominate the right.
Like many of you, I don’t like the idea of co-opting a socially conservative agenda simply to obtain our goals. That is why our challenge is to get others to come to our side, and there are plenty of social conservatives who would love to “stick it to the feminists” with an infusion of political activity and momentum from the men’s movement. We must take over the conservative movement and make it our own. Forget about a broadbased movement in both parties; this only dilutes our energy.
Short term: Letter writing campaigns, phone campaigns, target specific legislation and electoral candidates
Long term: Take over the conservative movement, and thereby the Republican party and its immense political resources.
John Dias
Founder, DontMakeHerMad.com
Hi,
I agree that letter writing does help, especially if you get 10 or more friends to write as well. They can ignore 1, but 10 is a trend. Also there is the old saying “money talks, bullshit walks” now imagine all Men in America claiming 8 on their taxes, putting what they would of paid in a money market account and not paying til 4/15 every year. Money not there for their for welfare queens, they will notice. Though i’d go a step further and reccomend all Americans do this, just to get an idea of how much of our pay goes to pay for lazy people and bridges to nowhere.
Debi912
I like the idea of increasing deductions.
Great dialog. Personally, I think that whatever change is to come will come as a result of hundreds of thousands of indivual men deciding that they’ve taken enough shit, acting on it in their individual lives, and finding like-minded men for support…kind of like the marriage “strike”, which I think is more a boycott than a strike. I think that American men, as a group, are too wrapped up in that silent, stoic and independant mindset to organize as marc advocates (Marc, I own your book, and love your message!). I also believe that other men are the first obstacle to overcome…most men are either stuck on chivalrous attitudes, thinking that womens’farts don’t stink, or they are oblivious and unconcerned about the issues, thinking that the MRA they know is a bit too “radical” or “extreme” until the day they get butt-fucked in family court. I see two more extreme outcomes…aquiescence or violence…more likely in the end than email campaigns.
We need to take a direct action approach. Letter writing will accomplish nil. We need to find out where the femnazi lawyers live and protest outside their homes. We need to find out where the “family court judges” live and protest outside their homes. We need to be heard, they need to listen. The system has taken everything from me, you are next, your sons will be slaves.
I think the marriage strike will have a HUGE impact. It’s trends will be obvious in under 10 years. In 10-20 years it will be a significant national issue.
The feminine archetype is now dominant in the U.S. and western world.
Feminism is causing the regression of women to the state of childhood: i.e., rights without responsibilities, consumption without production. For men, feminism has caused the opposite: responsibilities without rights. People with responsibilities but no rights are slaves. We are currently headed for a world in which women are children and men are slaves.
Feminsim is evil and I predict a “perfect storm†in approximately 20-30 years. Another generation of boys without fathers. A big push in gay activism in law. Caucasian America is already reproducing at comparably lower rates relative to other groups. Currently almost 50% of our secondary schools are made up of underperforming minorities (Blacks & Hispanics) with no American identity or an interest in one, and in 20 years, will force the U.S. to compete with the Chinese and Indians with approximately half of itâ€s workforce. These people will not be in college. They will be in the lower or underground economy. 70% of Black families have no father. In second generation Hispanics (and higher) the percentage is higher. We are looking at a HUGE increase of out of wedlock births. Huge social costs that will not correct the root cause (if history serves as a guide). So half the population has to compete with China and India with a punitive tax burden. Men will continue to retreat from society. The MGTOW philosophy will quietly cause change. As more and more women see men turning away some of these will wonder why. Some women may even one day be capable of an honest look at how men have been treated unfairly. Caucasians will also have a culture of fatherlessness but a bigger issue will be that Caucasian men will not produce offspring. America is slowly collapsing. In 20-40 years America may disintegrate into distinct regions that have not integrated culturally with their border regions. I think if the government passes amnesty for illegals that this will accelerate Americaâ€s disintegration. Citizenship will cease to have meaning. At least 100 million illegals with no interest to assimilate. We will be North Americanâ€s not U.S. citizens anymore living in a country filled with a huge and growing underclass demanding more and more.
The government, politicians, and elites have caused so much social damage that it is impossible to steer the ship in the right direction in time. There will be a huge increase in gang activities in some regions. There will probably be race wars. Incomes will drop because we will not compete well with China and India and this will breed discontent all over America. China will be a military threat challenging us across the globe, jockeying with the U.S. for dominance. We have replaced the male archetype with the feminine archetype which will be completely unable to deal with these problems-many of which it created.
We as a nation have been very slow, and are only now beginning to see that feminine evil exists. We have long recognized masculine evil. I donâ€t think America will come to grasp the extent of feminine evil unless it is spoken about out loud.
The intelligent man chooses his friends wisely. Any male that is a feminist enabler is the enemy. American women who are feminist and feminist sympathizers are the enemy. American women who claim to be for menâ€s rights but part ways with men when their own biases get challenged are the enemy. The intelligent man chooses his friends wisely and plans his life intelligently. The government is doing everything it can to destabilize this society.
The intelligent man sees whatâ€s going on and plans his own survival accordingly. The matriarchy will one day be existing in a living hell of itâ€s own creation.
btw-The intelligent man discussed above will be sitting on top of the dysfunctional American culture. The intelligent man sees American women for what they are: a dead end. The divorce statistics prove this. The entitlement mentality, the self-love above all else, prove this.
Men we are dealing with a situation that is no different from a totalitarian or fascist group systematically marginalizing another group.. namely us Men..
The only solution is to build up your family and home life with a woman who has traditional values. You family is your fortress but first you must build a strong one that will last and then protect it.
Having a marriage to a traditional russian woman for example is an idea solution for this. You can read more about this at my site if you wish..
http://russianwomen.wordpress.com/2006/08/23/your-freedom-in-the-face-of-feminism-and-facism/
Good Luck!
GL
Returning to “traditional values” makes little sense to me. It is a utopian dream based on a fantasy of the past. We have moved on. If you bring a Russian woman to this country, how long will it take her to learn the system? Weeks. Eastern European women believe in fleecing men. What better place for them than the USA?
In an era when women have more rights than men, can earn as much as they want, and can manipulate the courts, marrying a woman who earns nothing is a recipe for disaster: she can destroy you in divorce court.
Marry a woman who earns a lot of money, who LOVES men, who believes in fairness. My book — http://www.bookworld.com/bottom.cfm?content=feature&I030_cust_ref_01=0-9745017-1-9Â – tells you how to do this. And … one more thing … get an airtight prenup!
I would caution against tying the men’s movement with conservatism. Why? Because the feminists and liberals will easily split minority men off from the movement by offering goodies and playing on the anti-white male sentiments that exist in the minority communities. This would isolate white males and their simply are not enough of us to have any political force.
I actually think it would be better to try to attach ourselves the the democratic party even though a lot of us find many within that party to be repugnant. Talk up the civil rights aspects of our cause and make sure many non-white faces are spoke people when addressing the media and politicians.
Instead of making this a party issue, I believe that all men’s-rights activities must transcend parties and politics.
Suggested party-neutral message: Any degradation of men — by any person or any law — is a move to destroy marriage, the family, and children.
MensNewsDaily could become a petition engine to help us blast the lawmakers. Imagine the volume of petitions constantly going to Washington and state capitols, to make our voices heard. Contact Mike Lasalle to suggest it.
I was told by Mr. Rudov after I e-mailed him to post this message here:
There might be a way to bring mens/boys issues to light by getting involved in a class action lawsuit:
http://news.mensactivism.org/node/5746
Posted on Wed, 2006-08-02 16:39.
All 3000+ county classactions are tentatively scheduled for nationwide simultaneous court filings during “Constitution Week” (Sept 17-23), assuming a couple of remaining manpower factors are leveraged into proper place by that time.
Plaintiffs are THREE “Classes”: (1) noncustodials; (2) young adult children of custody; (3) any taxpayer — YES, each and every one of the 230+ million American taxpayers are eligible Plaintiffs in these lawsuits against family court injustices.
The summary of the lawsuit is located here:
http://www.indianacrc.org/ncp-n-taxpayer.html
You need to find the county in which the local coordinator is located and that list of states can be found here:
http://www.indianacrc.org/classactionco.html
And finally as a last resort if you have problems here is their contact page:
http://www.indianacrc.org/contacticrc.html.
Here is the banner to link to their web site:
http://www.indianacrc.org/images/icrc2004banner.gif
Lastly, I’ve been reading the articles by Jeff Adams and he feels the same way I do about the political parties in this country. Well, I just found out about a third party that looks promising it’s called the Freedom Party.
Here is their US site:
http://www.freedomparty.us
Their front page has not changed so please contact them and ask them to set up a blog to communicate with people interested in their party:
http://www.freedomparty.us/e-mail/e-mail.feedback.htm
they have an international site located here:
http://www.freedomparty.org
and the most active site is located in Ontario:
http://www.freedomparty.on.ca
I hope this will help make a difference.
Mezz Mezzrow Jr.
I was told by Mr. Rudov after I e-mailed him to post this message here:
There might be a way to bring mens/boys issues to light by getting involved in a class action lawsuit:
http://news.mensactivism.org/node/5746
Posted on Wed, 2006-08-02 16:39.
All 3000+ county classactions are tentatively scheduled for nationwide simultaneous court filings during “Constitution Week” (Sept 17-23), assuming a couple of remaining manpower factors are leveraged into proper place by that time.
Plaintiffs are THREE “Classes”: (1) noncustodials; (2) young adult children of custody; (3) any taxpayer — YES, each and every one of the 230+ million American taxpayers are eligible Plaintiffs in these lawsuits against family court injustices.
The summary of the lawsuit is located here:
http://www.indianacrc.org/ncp-n-taxpayer.html
You need to find the county in which the local coordinator is located and that list of states can be found here:
http://www.indianacrc.org/classactionco.html
And finally as a last resort if you have problems here is their contact page:
http://www.indianacrc.org/contacticrc.html.
Here is the banner to link to their web site:
http://www.indianacrc.org/images/icrc2004banner.gif
Lastly, I’ve been reading the articles by Jeff Adams and he feels the same way I do about the political parties in this country. Well, I just found out about a third party that looks promising it’s called the Freedom Party.
Here is their US site:
http://www.freedomparty.us
Their front page has not changed so please contact them and ask them to set up a blog to communicate with people interested in their party:
http://www.freedomparty.us/e-mail/e-mail.feedback.htm
they have an international site located here:
http://www.freedomparty.org
and the most active site is located in Ontario:
http://www.freedomparty.on.ca
I hope this will help make a difference.
Mezz Mezzrow Jr.